|
+David H. Janda, M.D., $Edward M. Wojtys, M.D., ||Fred M. Hankin, M.D.,
*Milbry E. Benedict, M.D., $Robert N. Hensinger, M.D.
from +Orthopaedic Surgery Associates, St. Joseph Mercy Hospital, the
$Section of Orthopaedic Surgery, and the *Department of Recreational Sports,
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, and ||Community Orthopedic Surgery,
PC, and Huron Valley Hand Surgery, Ypsilanti, Michigan
See the Abstract
Injury prevention is a major public health issue. The workplace, consumer
products, and public services are all governed by regulations designed to
protect the individual from unnecessary risks. Athletes are also governed by
rules and equipment regulations designed to prevent injuries during competition.
An athlete's risk of sustaining a sports-related injury is influenced by
several factors. High impact sports, such as football place the athlete at an
increased risk of musculoskeletal trauma. Governing rules that regulate the
games can modify injury patterns. Restricting pitching time in Little League
baseball is one such example of a health related regulation. Strict enforcement
of rules by vigilant officials can foster the safety of the players and greatly
reduce the threat of injury. Peterson's 1970 analysis [5] of injury rates in football led to the elimination of
cross-body blocking and hence a substantial reduction in football injuries.
Unfortunately, many injuries that predispose the recreational athlete to injury
are difficult to control. Poor technique (i.e., sliding), inadequate coaching,
lack of conditioning, or concomitant use of alcohol may all contribute to the
problem.
It is difficult to control and regulate adherence to safety rules in
recreational athletics, even when games are officiated. As a consequence,
passive preventive measures that do not depend on the athlete, referee, level of
competition, or skill should be incorporated into the sport.
Despite driver education programs, improved road markings, and better road
construction, motor vehicle accidents continue to occur. The use of seat belts
is an appropriate semipassive preventive measure. However, seat belt use is
dependent upon the driver fastening the belt. Recently, a pure passive
preventive system has been developed in which the seat belt automatically locks
around the driver. Another example of a passive system is the recent institution
of airbags in cars. The use of seat belts or airbags does not change any of the
underlying causative effects of the accident. They do, however, alter the
severity of injury to the driver. Examples of similar extrinsic or passive
preventive measures in sports include using protective eye wear during racquet
sports, head gear during batting, and break-away hockey nets during hockey.
The National Electronic Surveillance Systems of the United States Consumer
Product Safety Commission has estimated that softball is the number one sport
leading to emergency room visits in the United States.[6] Further, the American Softball Association has
estimated that 40 million individuals, nationally, participate in organized
softball leagues, playing an estimated 23 million games per year. In addition to
a wide variation in age in these leagues, there is also a wide range in physical
condition and athletic ability.
The price of recreational sports injuries can be categorized into short-term
and long-term expenditures. Short-term impacts include: acute medical care
costs, time lost from work, and expenses related to the injured player's
employer concerning replacement or lost production. The long-term con sequences
include: medical care expenditures, restriction of future athletic activities,
permanent functional impairment, and escalating insurance premiums for the
injured player, his employer, the field owner, and the softball league itself
The potential costs of these injuries can be staggering; therefore, prevention
is of utmost importance.
The consequences of a sports-related injury may include lost wages,
restriction of future athletic activities, and long term functional impairment.
In a previous retrospective study, [2] we identified
base sliding as the mechanism responsible for 71% of recreational softball
injuries. This review indicated that a variety of injuries resulted from base
sliding, including ligament disruptions and fractures. The most common mechanism
of sliding injuries was impact loading of a poorly positioned extremity or
joint.
The unexpected costs of these traumatic events were investigated in order to
facilitate and emphasize the discussion of their prevention.[2] The cost of injury to the player, his or her
employer, and the sponsoring softball organization can be significant. For
instance, athletic knee injuries are common and can post high morbidity for
participants. Time lost from work and future functional impairment need to be
considered We explored a variety of preventive methods, including the
elimination of sliding, improved instruction in sliding techniques, the use of
recessed bases, and the use of break-away bases.
Softball and baseball have, are, and will always be heavily steeped in
tradition. We found that making sliding illegal was impractical since giving up
sliding was unacceptable to the participants. Instructional clinics were
offered; however, few of the recreational athletes attended. Recessed bases,
like home plate, are a viable alternative; however, poor visualization caused
umpires to object as "safe versus out" calls became an overwhelming problem.
These solutions did not deal with the problem of indecision in the mind of the
baserunner, poor musculoskeletal conditioning, occasional alcohol consumption,
and a desire to impress one's team mates and fans.
With these factors in mind, we felt that an altered base design would provide
a practical, reliable, and cost-effective means of reducing sliding injuries.
Because most injuries occurred during rapid deceleration against stationary
bases, quick-release bases were chosen to modify this mechanism of injury.
METHODS
Break-away bases were placed on all softball fields at our institutions. The
break-away base system used was the Rogers Break-Away base (Elizabethtown, PA).
Each set of three bases costs S350.00, which is less than twice the cost of a
set of standard stationary bases. The system consists of a rubber mat that is
set flush with the infield surface and is anchored into the ground by a buried
metal post similar to that used with standard stationary bases. Rubber grommets
arising from the rubber mat attach to anchoring sockets on the undersurface of
the break-away portion of the base. This particular system is available in four
models: youth, teen, adult, and professional, each differing in the amount of
force needed to cause the base to break away. The difference between the models
is in the consistency of the top portion of the base (i.e., the youth model is
less rigidly held and breaks away easier than the teen, adult, or professional
models. The adult model which we used, requires 700 foot pounds of force for the
break-away portion of the base to release, or 20% of the force necessary for a
stationary base to disassemble. Base sliding injuries that occurred on the study
fields were documented by field supervisors, and followup was performed by one
of the authors. In addition, local hospital emergency rooms, the Student Health
Service, and private practice orthopaedic surgeons were requested to keep logs
of patients if they were injured on the study fields; these patients were also
seen in followup by the authors.
RESULTS
In the second phase of the study,[3] 633 games
were played on break-away base fields and 627 games were played on stationary
base diamonds in the Ann Arbor summer league. The players ranged in age from 18
to 55 years and included college students, laborers, executives, and physicians.
Teams were assigned to one of four leagues based on skill level and previous
playing experience. Women participated in a coed league. Teams were assigned to
playing fields on a random and rotating basis. All fields were maintained in the
same manner and all experienced the same weather conditions.
During the two seasons studied in Phase II of the study, a total of 45
sliding injuries occurred on the stationary base fields, while only 2 sliding
injuries occurred on the break away base fields. This difference was
statistically significant (P < 0.001). Of the 45 injuries sustained by
players sliding into stationary bases, 43 involved the lead foot or hand. The
distribution of ankle injuries sustained on the stationary base fields is shown
in Table 1. Ankle injuries predominated accounting for 24
of the 45 total injuries. The total medical charges for these 45 players was
approximately S55,050 (S1223 per injury). Two other players were injured when
they tripped over the stationary bases as they ran around the diamond. One of
these players sustained an ankle fracture and the other a scaphoid fracture.
However, these injuries were not included in our analysis since they did not
occur as a result of sliding, and we were unsure of whether break-away bases
could have prevented them.
Two isolated injuries occurred on the break-away bases: a nondisplaced medial
malleolar ankle fracture and an ankle sprain. The total medical charges for
these two players was approximately S700.00 (S350.00 per injury). It should be
noted that in these two sliding injuries, the bases did not break away. Opposing
players were not standing on the bases during these occurrences.
The director of field supervisors was interviewed two or three times each
month during the study concerning experiences with the break-away bases. The
field supervisors felt that softball play was not significantly delayed with the
use of break-away bases, even though sliding players broke away the bases up to
sis times during each game. Properly seated break-away bases did not detach
during routine base running. The umpires did not have difficulty with judgment
calls (safe versus out) when the bases released. For continuation of play
circumstances, when the break-away portion of the base did break away, the
rubber mat that is flush with the infield surface was considered the base when
determining if the runner was safe or out.
Finally, in Phase III of the study, we performed a long term followup of 1035
games played on fields that had all been switched over to break-away bases. The
same surveillance system was used. Two injuries occurred during the study
period. Each player sustained an ankle sprain that was treated with protected
weightbearing. The total medical cost for these injuries was S400.00.
One player sustained a lateral collateral ligament ankle sprain to his left
foot, which was not his lead leg. This injury was sustained as the patient
caught his cleat on the groundÑ he never reached the base. The second injured
player sustained a deltoid ligament sprain to her lead foot while sliding into
the base.
TABLE 1 Sliding injuries 1986 to 1987 [3]
Number of injuries Number of injuries
involving involving
Type of injury stationary bases breakaway bases
Ankle sprains 18 1
Ankle fractures 6 1
Skin abrasions 5
Knee
MCL sprain 3
ACL tear 2
Tibia/fibula fractures 1
Shoulder subluxion 1
AC Joint Injury (Type I) 1
Wrist Fractures 1
Wrist sprains 1
Foot contusion/sprain 1
Finger ligament injury
(volar plate) 1
Finger dislocation 1
Finger fracture 3
Totals 45 2
DISCUSSION
Having identified sliding as the mechanism most frequently leading to
softball injuries, we instituted a prospective study addressing this mechanism
of injury. A follow-up study then reinforced our initial findings. The
prospective study sup ports the concept that modifying the bases can alter the
frequency of sliding injuries. An analysis of our injury rates reveals that one
injury occurred in every 13.9 games (7.2%) on the stationary base fields, while
on the break-away base fields, one injury occurred every 316.5 games (0.3%). So,
for each sliding injury on the break-away base field, there were 22.7 injuries
on the stationary base field. Even with break away bases, injuries will still
occur. Most will be a result of judgment errors by the runner. Improper sliding
technique, poor timing, inadequate physical conditioning, and alcohol
consumption contribute to sliding injuries. Break-away bases, however, can
modify the outcome when these factors are involved.
In our prospective followup of 1035 consecutive games with break-away bases,
two sliding injuries occurred. When comparing these results to our results in
Phase II of the study, the trend of diminishing sliding injuries secondary to
break-away bases was reinforced. In Phase III, one injury occurred for every
517.5 games (0.19%).
In a biomechanical study of sliding by Corzatt et al., [1] sliding was analyzed kinematically. Four phases were
identified: the sprint, attainment of the sliding position, the airborne phase,
and the landing phase. The authors indicate that injuries occurred in the last
phase, the landing phase, where a small amount of the body area is not only used
to absorb the shock of impact but also is subjected to high horizontal
velocities as the base is contacted.
The quick-release feature of the break-away bases decreases the impact load
generated against the athlete's limb and the subsequent trauma inflicted upon
it. Sliding players come in all sizes and approach the bases from all angles, 80
that no one preventive system can be completely foolproof The forces generated
by the trajectory athlete against the ground or other players may still be more
than sufficient to result in severe injuries to the musculoskeletal system.
Prevention of sliding injuries would be beneficial to the athlete. Reduction
of losses sustained by the player, the player's employer, and insurance carriers
could be realized. The extra cost for a set of break-away bases ($350 compared
to $1c,0 a set for standard bases) is far outweighed by the potential savings in
health care costs if a sliding injury can be prevented.
An actuarial analysis by the Section of Epidemiology and Injury at the
Centers for Disease Control has estimated, based on Phase II of our study, that
by changing from stationary to break-away bases across the United States,
approximately 1.7 million injuries per year would be prevented and over $2.0
billion in medical care costs per year could be saved.[4]
Injuries are inherent in any recreational activity. Most base sliding
accidents result from judgment errors of the runner, poor sliding technique, and
inadequate physical conditioning. Break-sway bases can serve as a passive
intervention to modify the outcome of these factors. The use of break-away bases
decreases injuries without player involvement or altering the play, excitement,
entertainment, competition or interest in the game. This intervention was also
independent of players, umpires, weather, or the time of day.
Sports-related injuries are expensive for the player, the employer, and the
insurance carrier. Economic costs are, of course, an important concern when the
long-term health of the athlete is impaired by a sliding injury. The use of
break away bases decreases the number and severity of softball injuries.
Break-away bases are cost-effective and safer than standard stationary bases. In
recreational softball leagues, the use of break-away bases should be mandatory.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors gratefully acknowledge the invaluable help of Dr. David Amato of
the Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, for his help with the
statistical analysis, and the Rogers Sports Corporation based in Elizabethtown,
Pennsylvania, for the donation of some of the bases used in this study.
REFERENCES
- Corzatt RD, Groppel JL, et al. The biomechanics of
head first versus feet-first sliding. Am J Sports Med 1984;12:229
- Janda DH, Hankin FM, Wojtys EM. Softball injuries,
cost, cause, prevention. Am Fam Physician 1986;33:143-4.
- Janda DH, Wojtys EM, et al. Softball sliding
injuries. A prospective study comparing standard and modified bases. JAMA
1988;259:1848-50.
- Janda DH, Wojtys EM, et al. Softball sliding
injuries-Michigan, 1986-1987. MMWR 1988;37:169-70.
- Peterson TR The cross-body block, the major cause of
knee injuries. JAMA 1970;211:211-4.
- Product summary report:National Electronic Injury
Surveillance System/Hazard Identification and Analysis. National Injury
Information Clearinghouse, 1982:19-20.
This article was published
as: "A Three Phase Analysis of the Prevention of Recreational Softball
Injuries" The American Journal of Sports Medicine Vol. 18, No. 6,
1990, pp. 632-635 Janda DH, Wojtys FM, Hankin FM, Benedict ME, Hensinger RN
It is possible to order a copy of this article.
|