visit ipsm.org
  about ipsm  
  projects  
  publications  
  press releases  
  symposium  
  institute update  
    current institute update  
    january 2003 issue  
    february 2002 issue  
    july 2001 issue  
    10 year anniversary  
  credits  
  memberships  
  links  
     
search  
go search 
home   |   contact us
home > institute update > july 2003 >
institute update

Reducing Injuries in Youth Ice Hockey:
    If There’s a Will, There are Many Ways
 

By Janet Zimmerman, Ph.D. in public health and youth hockey parent

In a state championship game, a player suffered a head injury when an opponent pushed the player’s feet out from under her during a fast breakaway, sending her flying up in the air. The player fell flat on her back and hit her head hard on the ice as she landed. The player showed signs of having a concussion. The game had to be stopped, the parents were called from the stands, and she had to be led off the ice. This player is 10 years old.
At a recent playoff game, a player, whose coach calls out to the team, “Get physical!”, pushed an opposing player into the boards with a force sufficient to crack the player’s helmet, knock her down, stop the game, and cause her to suffer headaches and nausea throughout the night. The player, age 11, wasn’t near the puck at the time she was pushed, and there was no call by the referees on the play.

These injuries occurred in girl’s hockey, where aggressive body contact isn’t allowed. One would hope that instances such as these are rarities, but as anyone who spends time in amateur hockey knows, they are not. An increasing body of evidence paints an alarming picture of injuries sustained by youth ice hockey players. Much of the recent work in this area has been conducted in Canada. Although the styles of play may differ between U.S. and Canadian youth hockey players, the basic rules of the game are the same. Studies such as the following send out a word of warning to us all:

  • A recent study in British Columbia found that among 440 players age 15-20, 63% of them had suffered at least one head injury, and 111 of them actually lost consciousness at some point in their career while playing minor hockey. The leading cause of concussion, whether or not the player lost consciousness, was a player’s head striking the boards, including the end glass. A $1.3 million study is underway at Simon Fraser University in British Columbia to explore concussions and mild head injuries in youth hockey players and the impact of these injuries on the lives of children and youth.
  • The incidence of concussions in hockey is on the rise: whereas concussions accounted for 4% of reported injuries in hockey in 1996 in the U.S., the percentage increased to 17% in 2001. The actual frequency of concussions is likely to be much higher, given that these figures include only reported cases.
  • In a comprehensive study of violence in youth hockey, 44% of 212 youth hockey players surveyed indicated that they had been injured from rough play (e.g., fighting, high sticking, checking from behind), sustaining injuries ranging from concussions and neck injuries, to slashed wrists and ankles. Sixteen percent indicated that they wanted to stop playing hockey or get off the ice because the game got too rough. Seventeen percent indicated their parents have urged them to leave hockey because of rough play.

Clearly, some level of injury is inevitable, as hockey is a fast-paced, nonstop action contact sport and mistakes are made. But injury that results from dangerous and illegal plays can be avoided by establishing a climate in which all players, coaches, parents, and referees agree to strictly support the rules of the game rather than to tolerate (and sometimes even encourage) rule violations. What follows is a range of approaches discussed in the field and in the sports medicine literature for making hockey safer for kids to play. Some strategies are easier to implement than others. The payoff of making progress on any of them, though, would be enormous if our kids could play the sport they love so well with a reduced likelihood that they will be injured as a result.

Referees/ Referee Associations

Achieve greater consistency in enforcing the rules. Increasing the consistency of rule enforcement among referees is perhaps one of the most vexing but important challenges in reducing injurious plays and increasing safety in youth ice hockey. It clearly is extremely difficult for two referees to see all plays on the ice and to make precise judgments given the split second timing under which decisions need to be made. As any hockey parent or coach knows, referees do not penalize all rule violations. In a study of emergency room visits among youth aged 7-18 for injuries related to ice hockey, for example, penalties were assigned on only 3 (4%) of the 85 plays that caused them to be injured. Injured players judged 40% of these plays to be illegal, and 85% of these “illegal” plays to be “injury potential” infractions, as identified by USA Hockey. USA Hockey recommends that all violations with an injury potential be penalized: examples include boarding, charging, checking from behind, cross-checking, elbow/kneeing, high sticking, roughing, and slashing, among others. Without consistent penalties for breaking the rules, the rules lose their meaning and players are freer to break them.

Several approaches can be pursued for improving the consistency of officiating and increasing the likelihood that all dangerous plays will be penalized:

  • Tighten certification requirement to demand more stringent testing on rule interpretation and enforcement before certification or re-certification is granted.
  • Enhance continuing training requirements aimed at reducing variations in officiating, especially for dangerous plays and rule violations against players who do not have the puck.
  • Significantly increase oversight and monitoring of referees’ performance (e.g., videotape games to enable expert panels to review problem areas and to devise corrective actions; have unannounced monitoring of referees’ performance during games by expert judges; make detailed feedback/complaint forms more readily available in all rinks)
  • Increase accountability of referees and severity of consequences for persistent problems with performance.
  • Require that higher-level referees officiate younger as well as older youth games.

Amateur Hockey Associations
Set safety in youth ice hockey as a high priority

  • Establish state and local level task forces to devise strategies for improving safety in youth hockey. Develop and promote the ideas behind the Fair Play System, in which strong incentives (points are added in the standings) are provided to reward individual players and teams who have few penalties, and strong disincentives (points are deducted in the standings) are established to discourage penalties. Strengthen consequences for failing to follow code of conduct agreements that typically are part of Fair Play programs.
  • Vigorously promote the integration of the Heads Up program into daily practices. Heads Up is designed to prevent serious head and spinal injuries by teaching players and coaches about how injuries happen and providing techniques to avoid injuries.
  • Encourage the STOP program to be adopted by all teams. This program is designed to improve fair play and reduce the likelihood that players will check from behind, a dangerous play that can lead to spinal injury.
  • Require more vigorous continuing education for coaches on the prevention and management of injurious plays.

Explore possible rule revisions to protect youth from serious injury

  • Increase the severity of penalties for violations with significant potential to injure, whether intentional or not and whether a player was injured or not (e.g., make more liberal use of suspensions not only from the current game but from the subsequent game or games; require the offending team to pay for a third high-level referee at the next game, whether home or away).
  • Adopt more stringent suspension provisions for injury potential plays; establish a limit beyond which a player would be banned from playing.
  • Reassign to a different age level extreme variations in children by weight and size (make it impossible for a 70 lb. 12 year old to play against a 140 lb. 12 year old, for example).
  • Track frequency of injury potential penalties by team; include upper limits on what is allowed for coach re-certification or coach selection by local hockey associations.
  • Alongside win/loss records, post the comparative frequency of major rule violations by teams and players on the hockey association’s website; this not only would help inform decisions to recertify or select a coach, but in parents’ and players’ decisions to join a team. will be injured as a result.”

Help players, coaches, parents, referees become informed

  • Develop educational videotapes that demonstrate precisely what is and is not allowed within the parameters of each rule. Recruit celebrity hockey players, coaches, and sports broadcasters to star in the videos.
  • Develop videotapes and other educational materials on preventing, assessing and managing common injuries of hockey. In a recent study, fewer than _ of injured hockey players recalled receiving instruction on injury prevention.
  • Require players, parents, coaches, and referees to watch the above videotapes at the start of the season.
  • Closely track research on safety in hockey; inform others of findings; work closely with the research communities to support efforts in injury prevention.

Retain prohibition of checking in non-checking leagues

  • Proponents of changing the rules to allow checking in non-checking leagues argue that players will be less inclined to be reckless or resort to violent plays if they are taught how to give and receive check and are allowed to check legally. This argument gives insufficient attention to the sizable body of evidence that checking—both illegal and legal—increase the likelihood of injury, including serious injury. A safer strategy would be to work toward reducing illegal plays through other approaches described in this paper, rather than through promoting the expansion of checking.
  • The American Academy of Pediatrics and others have recommended that all checking be banned among youth age 15 and under. The evidence and rationale underlying this recommendation warrant serious consideration by all participants in amateur hockey.

Coaches
Incorporate safety issues into daily practices

  • Train players to defend themselves against dangerous plays, even in non-checking leagues.
  • Check the safety of players’ equipment; notify parents if there are opportunities for improvement.
  • Teach players about the limitations of equipment in preventing injury.
  • Increase practice-to-games ratio to increase training and conditioning time.
  • Advise players and parents of off-ice conditioning exercises, including neck strengthening and flexibility exercises.

Establish no tolerance for injurious plays or disrespect

  • Provide strong disincentives (e.g, reduced ice time, probation) for engaging in dangerous illegal plays.
  • Refrain from putting players with a history of injury potential penalties in the game toward the end of a period or the end of the game, when violence and injuries are more common.
  • Clarify to players and parents that any form of disrespect toward opposing team or officials on or off the ice will not be tolerated.
  • Clarify that all complaints about a referee, another coach, parents or players should come to you, rather than through any direct or indirect confrontation.

Emphasize skill develop; reduce the pressure of winning

  • Measure success based on progress in the team’s technical and strategic skills and the level of contentment, excitement, and respect among the players.
  • Routinely acknowledge excellent plays and areas of progress.

Parents
Do what you can to keep your child safe

  • Provide children with the highest quality equipment possible.
  • Make sure players are properly hydrated, rested, and conditioned prior to games.
  • Keep players conditioned during theoff-season.
  • Remain informed about safety issues.

Players and Parents
Keeping winning in perspective

  • Be resolved never to let the pressure to win overpower having fun and maintaining a respectfulness toward other players and officials.
  • Resolve never to resort to violence or aggressive behavior.

Researchers, Foundations

There are striking gaps in our knowledge of the prevalence, causes, prevention, and management of injuries in youth ice hockey. Giving the growing number of youth who play ice hockey in the United States, the need for additional research is increasingly urgent.

Conduct ongoing and more rigorous analyses of equipment and rink safety

  • Conduct more rigorous helmet impact tests to identify superior design in preventing concussions.
  • Design superior chest protection against sudden impact.
  • Investigate optimal board design to reduce the severity of impact.
  • Continue to devise improved strategies for rink air quality.

Track and analyze injury patterns

  • Improve and expand systems for tracking and reporting injuries (e.g., revise score sheets to document types of penalties and frequency of injury; survey parents at the end of the season to document occurrence and management of injuries among players).
  • Endorse efforts to separate ice hockey from field, roller, and other forms of hockey in existing data tracking systems (e.g., isolate admissions to the emergency room for injuries specific to ice hockey, for example).
  • Conduct detailed subgroup analyses to identify variations in frequency, types, and site of injury by a range of predictive or explanatory variables related to individual players (e.g., age, gender, body size).
  • Build on our existing base of knowledge of injury patterns according to game-related variables (player position, whether game vs. practice, season vs. tournament, game period and point of play in game).
  • Investigate at greater length the frequency and nature of injury in checking vs. nonchecking leagues.

Evaluate interventions to reduce injury and barriers to implementation

  • Evaluate the effectiveness of and attitudes toward initiatives designed to reduce injury in youth hockey.
  • Evaluate the adequacy of certification requirements and continuing education programs for coaches and referees relative to injury prevention, assessment and management.
  • Examine strategies for overcoming political and other obstacles to implementing or expanding safety programs.

Investigate knowledge and attitudes of players, parents, coaches, referees

  • Investigate variations in players’ attitudes about risk-taking and willingness to engage in dangerous plays; investigate attitudes or parents, coaches, referees toward violence in youth ice hockey; make use of existing survey tools—e.g., “Eliminating Violence in Hockey,” by Bernie Pascall.
  • Determine gaps in coaches’ and referees’ knowledge and understanding of injury prevention, assessment, and management.

Encourage the development of position papers

  • Make greater use of position papers to stimulate discussion and extend the reach of scientific findings to the diverse participants in youth ice hockey.

So what do we conclude from all of this?

It should be clear that there is no shortage of possibilities for improving safety in youth ice hockey. Routine reminders by referees before games of the types of plays that will not be tolerated, increased practice time spent training players on injury prevention — any number of incremental approaches can play a part in making hockey a safer sport for kids to play. The good news is that if we all make the effort, children and youth can indulge in the sport they love with a lower risk of injury. The intense excitement of hockey depends on keeping our kids in top form in the game, rather than on the sidelines recovering from a tough blow. Too much is at stake by not taking some measure of action.


Copyright © 2001 - 2008, The Institute for Preventative Sports Medicine. All rights reserved.